This is part of my point. For lesbians to be attracted to you as a “biological“ woman is to show how ridiculous their position is. Not acknowledging the fact that you are a man is to contradict their very status as lesbians. What they are essentially doing is reducing gender to sexual equipment. We both know that the two are unrelated.

I can respect that people may desire a relationship with someone who is equipped a certain way. This is a matter of taste and preference and has nothing to do with the identity of the potential partner. For instance, most people like mayonnaise. It makes me physically sick for psychological reasons. It is the way I am built. I respect people’s use of mayonnaise, but it always grosses me out to be around it. That’s just me, and not a criticism of others’ tastes.

If the radicalized lesbians are really saying that they prefer people with vaginas, what difference does it make whether it is a result of nature or medical science? They both look and function the same. A postop transwoman should be just as appealing as a natal one. On the other hand if they are also interested in a guy with a natural vagina, are they really lesbians? It seems to me that they have a vagino centric attitude towards people and sex. To them gender is not really important, equipment is. That is irrelevant to the definition of a woman. The reverse of course applies to trans men. I just can’t cover everything in one spot!🌹